MORGAN
v.
SANTUCCI ET AL.

D.C. Cir. | 1952-12-11
No. 11381
Before CLARK, FAHY and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.
201 F.2d 202 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1952)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM. ■

PER CURIAM. ■

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, imposing damages upon the appellant, the seller of certain real property, in a suit by the purchasers for breach of contract and misrepresentation. Appellant’s assignments of error with respect to the content of the trial court’s instructions to the jury appear to us to be without merit: the charge taken as a whole was a fair and adequate statement of the applicable law, as found in Lester v. Superior Motor Car Co., 1941, 73 App.D.C. 171, 117 F. 2d 780. See also Darnell v. Darnell, 91 U.S.App.D.C. -, 200 F. 2d 747; Stein v. Treger, 1950, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 400, 182 F. 2d 696. The jury’s verdict was based on sufficient evidence. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court will be

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw