LYONS ET AL.
v.
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP. ET AL.
LYONS ET AL.
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP. ET AL.
201 F.2d 510
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1953)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The defendants in the prior state court action brought by Westinghouse raised the •defense of illegality of the contract sued ■upon. Thereafter they brought the present action in the federal court and sought to •stay further proceedings in the state court. Judge Bondy rightly held that 28 U.S.C.A. § 2283 prevents .the issuance of such a stay. The appellants’ attempt to distinguish Red Rock Cola Co. v. Red Rock Bottlers, 5 Cir., 195 F. 2d 406, and Bascom Launder Corp. v. Telecoin Corp., D.C.S.D.N.Y., 9 F.R.D. 677 is not persuasive. We agree with those decisions.
The order is affirmed and our mandate will be issued forthwith. ■
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Int'l Controls Corp. v. Vesco, 490 F.2d 1334 (2d Cir. 1974)
-
Lyons v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp. & Gen. Elec. Co., 222 F.2d 184 (2d Cir. 1955)
-
Studebaker Corp. v. Gittlin, 360 F.2d 692 (2d Cir. 1966)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Red Rock Cola Co. v. Red Rock Bottlers, Inc., 195 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1952)