A & E INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
STAR CEILING AND FLOORS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
A & E INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
STAR CEILING AND FLOORS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
422 So. 2d 861
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1982)
Caution
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The grounds relied upon by the appellant for reversal have been considered in the light of the record, and briefs, and we find no reversible error has been shown. The record discloses that the case was fairly tried by the court and jury, that the verdict is supported by the evidence, and that the several rulings of the trial court challenged by appellant did not, on the record and the law, constitute harmful error. Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Gantt, 688 So. 2d 1012 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)…e period in question, the State should have noticed the defendant in jail and arranged to have him present for arraignment. See Jones v. State, 573 So. 2d 185 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Tirado v. Reese, 478 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); V.C. v. Ferguson, 422 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Granting the State more time to bring the defendant to trial would disembowel the speedy trial rule. See State v. Agee, 622 So. 2d 473 (Fla.1993). Even though the State filed the charges within the speedy trial period, sufficien…
-
Ferguson v. V.C., 427 So. 2d 722 (Fla. 1983)…PER CURIAM. This is a petition to review a decision of the Third District Court of Appeal reported as V.C., a juvenile, v. Ferguson, 422 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). We accepted jurisdiction because of direct conflict with the Fourth District Court of Appeal’s decision in Sherrod v. Franza, 396 So. 2d 1136 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). Our recent decision in Sherrod v. Franza, 427 So. 2d 161 Case No.…
-
R.K. v. State, 778 So. 2d 1098 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)…ate therefore failed to demonstrate that he was unavailable within the meaning of rule 8.090(d)(4) and it was error for the trial court to extend the speedy trial period. See In Interest of M.A., 483 So. 2d 511 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); V.C. v. Ferguson, 422 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), aff'd, 427 So. 2d 722 (Fla.1983). [*1099] The petition for writ of prohibition is granted. The trial court is directed to discharge R.K. POLEN, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur. . We reject the state's argument that the speedy…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence