ELMAR FORTSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ELMAR FORTSON, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
422 So. 2d 902
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1982)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error, and we accordingly affirm the convictions in this case. However, the judgment and sentence entered on these convictions refer to the offenses of dangerous display of a firearm rather than improper exhibition of a dangerous firearm. We accordingly remand for entry of a proper judgment reflecting that the appellant was found guilty of the offenses of improper exhibition of a firearm. The judgment and sentences are otherwise affirmed.
SCHEB, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL, and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dorman K. Kimbrell, Jr. v. Paige, 448 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. 1984)…ADKINS, Justice. This cause is before us on a question certified to the Court by the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Kimbrell v. Paige, 422 So. 2d 902, 905 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), as one of great public importance. The question is: Does Section 440.39(4), Florida Statutes (1981), bar a separate suit against a third party tort-feasor by an injured employee when such suit is filed more than one year a…
-
Frymer v. Mervyn Brettschneider, 696 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)…ave to such enforcement. Where the purpose of the statute has not been diminished or harmed and where due process has been afforded, this court has held that substantial compliance with a statute’s notice procedures is sufficient. Kimbrell v. Paige, 422 So. 2d 902, 904 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), approved, 448 So. 2d 1009 (Fla.1984); see also Patry v. Capps, 633 So. 2d 9 (Fla.1994) (holding that hand delivery of notice of intent to initiate litigation was sufficient to substantially comply with the notice requiremen…