JAMES
v.
UNITED STATES
JAMES
UNITED STATES
204 F.2d 733
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1953)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was convicted of entering a store with intent to steal, and of maliciously destroying property. His principle contentions are (1) that the officers who arrested him without a warrant had no probable cause to believe he had committed a felony, and therefore the evidence taken from him was illegally seized and should have been suppressed; and (2) the evidence presented at the trial was insufficient to convict. We find no error. Affirmed.