THOMAS FONTANA, LIBELLANT-APPELLANT,
v.
GRACE LINE, INC. AND STATES MARINE CORPORATION, RESPONDENTS, AND HURON STEVEDORING CORPORATION, PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, JERSEY CONTRACTING CORPORATION, ROSLYN SCOW CORPORATION, AND PENN STEVEDORING CORPORATION, RESPONDENTS-IMPLEADED, AND HURON STEVEDORING CORPORATION, INTERVENOR-APPELLEE
THOMAS FONTANA, LIBELLANT-APPELLANT,
GRACE LINE, INC. AND STATES MARINE CORPORATION, RESPONDENTS, AND HURON STEVEDORING CORPORATION, PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, JERSEY CONTRACTING CORPORATION, ROSLYN SCOW CORPORATION, AND PENN STEVEDORING CORPORATION, RESPONDENTS-IMPLEADED, AND HURON STEVEDORING CORPORATION, INTERVENOR-APPELLEE
205 F.2d 151
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1953)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 22 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Decree affirmed on opinion below, 106 F.Supp. 461.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (20 total)
-
Bloomer v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 445 U.S. 74 (U.S. 1980)
-
Haynes v. Rederi A/S Aladdin, 362 F.2d 345 (5th Cir. 1966)
-
Dodge v. Mitsui Shintaku Ginko K. K. Tokyo, 528 F.2d 669 (9th Cir. 1975)
Previewing 3 of 20 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence