UNITED RAILROAD OPERATING CRAFTS, A RAILROAD LABOR ORGANIZATION NATIONAL IN SCOPE, AND JOHN J. GALLAGHER, JR., HOWARD T. HUNT, CLIFFORD W. CARLSON AND ROBERT T. OWENS, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL MEMBERS OF THE PLAINTIFF RAILWAY ORGANIZATION AS A CLASS WHO ARE TOO NUMEROUS TO BE MADE PARTIES PLAINTIFFS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
WILLIAM WYER, AS TRUSTEE OF THE LONG ISLAND RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE FIREMEN AND ENGINEMEN AND BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES, BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN, INTERVENOR-APPELLEE; UNITED RAILROAD OPERATING CRAFTS, A RAILROAD LABOR ORGANIZATION, NATIONAL IN SCOPE, AND ROBERT M. HARKINSON AND ARTHUR T. BESWICK, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL MEMBERS OF THE PLAINTIFF RAILWAY ORGANIZATION AS A CLASS WHO ARE TOO NUMEROUS TO BE MADE PARTIES PLAINTIFFS, AND WILTON A. RYDER, PIAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, V. NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE, BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN, INTERVENOR-APPELLEE
UNITED RAILROAD OPERATING CRAFTS, A RAILROAD LABOR ORGANIZATION NATIONAL IN SCOPE, AND JOHN J. GALLAGHER, JR., HOWARD T. HUNT, CLIFFORD W. CARLSON AND ROBERT T. OWENS, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL MEMBERS OF THE PLAINTIFF RAILWAY ORGANIZATION AS A CLASS WHO ARE TOO NUMEROUS TO BE MADE PARTIES PLAINTIFFS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
WILLIAM WYER, AS TRUSTEE OF THE LONG ISLAND RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE FIREMEN AND ENGINEMEN AND BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES, BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN, INTERVENOR-APPELLEE; UNITED RAILROAD OPERATING CRAFTS, A RAILROAD LABOR ORGANIZATION, NATIONAL IN SCOPE, AND ROBERT M. HARKINSON AND ARTHUR T. BESWICK, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL MEMBERS OF THE PLAINTIFF RAILWAY ORGANIZATION AS A CLASS WHO ARE TOO NUMEROUS TO BE MADE PARTIES PLAINTIFFS, AND WILTON A. RYDER, PIAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, V. NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE, BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN, INTERVENOR-APPELLEE
205 F.2d 153
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1953)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The orders are affirmed on the opinion of the District Court in United Railroad Operating Crafts v. Wyer, Trustee, 111 F. Supp. -.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pa. R.R. Co. v. Rychlik, 352 U.S. 480 (U.S. 1957)
-
Alabaugh v. The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co., 222 F.2d 861 (4th Cir. 1955)
-
Pigott v. Detroit, 221 F.2d 736 (6th Cir. 1955)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence