NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, APPELLANT,
v.
PETERS, PICKLE, FLYNN, NIEMOELLER, STIEGLITZ & DOWNS, AND FREDERICK B. HART, ESQ. AND ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1982-12-07
No. 82-97
Before SCHWARTZ and PEARSON, DANIEL S. and FERGUSON, JJ.
422 So. 2d 1087 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1982) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed. See S.L.T. Warehouse Company v. Webb, 304 So. 2d 97 (Fla.1974); Mendez v. West Flagler Family Association, Inc., 303 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1974).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Shaddix v. State, 599 So. 2d 269 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
    …ny, must be determined by the trial court pursuant to section 948.03(l)(e), Florida Statutes (1989), and this purely judicial function may not be delegated to a probation officer. Larson v. State, 572 So. 2d 1368, 1371 (Fla.1991); Cisneros v. State, 422 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). We note the version of the restitution statute applicable at the time of the 1990 offense, see Bunting v. State, 361 So. 2d 810 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978), requires the trial court to order restitution as a condition of probation “unles…
  • Masslieno v. State, 498 So. 2d 628 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)
    …awful delegation of judicial responsibility to a nonjudicial officer. Hamm v. State, 403 So. 2d 1155, 1156 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Denson v. State, 493 So. 2d 60 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Gilford v. State, 487 So. 2d 53 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Cisneros v. State, 422 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1982). [*629] Accordingly, on the basis of this error, we are required to reverse that portion of the probation order which directs appellant to make restitution as directed by his probation officer, with directions to the trial court…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw