ROYAL FROZEN FISH COMPANY, INC., A NEW YORK CORPORATION, APPELLANT,

v.

AMER SEAFOODS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (34 total)

• Cunningham v. Standard Guar. Ins. Co., 630 So. 2d 179 (Fla. 1994)
  …olved, and is not dependent upon the state of facts' which may appear in a particular ease.” Hunt v. Hunt, 72 N.Y. 217. Malone v. Meres, 91 Fla. 709, 725, 109 So. 677, 683 (1926) (citation omitted). In Florida Power & Light Co. v. Canal Authority, 423 So. 2d 421 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982), review denied, 434 So. 2d 887 (Fla.1983), Florida Power filed a motion in 1981 to vacate judgments of condemnation entered in 1967 on the ground that the petitions upon which the judgments were based did not include the authoriz…
• Mouzon v. Mouzon, 458 So. 2d 381 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)
  …132, Fla.Stat. . Fla. Const.Art. V, § 5(b); § 26.012(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (1981). . As to court subject matter jurisdiction and its invocation by pleadings and perfection by service of process, see generally Fla. Power & Light Co. v. Canal Authority, 423 So. 2d 421 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982), rev. den., 434 So. 2d 887 (Fla.1983). . Section 49.021, Florida Statutes, relating to service of process by publication, commences with the qualifying words, "Where personal service of process cannot be had . See also Herbert…
• Strommen v. Strommen, 927 So. 2d 176 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)
  …nheimer, Interstate Custody: Initial Jurisdiction and Continuing Jurisdiction Under the UCCJA, 14 Fam. L. Q. 203, 214-215 (1981).”). Such subject matter jurisdiction must be properly invoked and perfected. See Fla. Power & Light Co. v. Canal Auth., 423 So. 2d 421, 423 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982) (citing Cortina v. Cortina, 98 So. 2d 334 (Fla.1957)). “A court’s jurisdiction is generally invoked in a given case by a party filing a proper pleading which alleges material facts demonstrating (1) the existence of a judici…

  ← 1 / 3 →

Authorities Cited

• Engineered Storage Sys., Inc. v. Nat'l Partitions & Interiors, Inc., 415 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)