CHARLES CHAPLIN, PETITIONER,
v.
HON. JOHN W. CLANCY, DISTRICT JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT
CHARLES CHAPLIN, PETITIONER,
HON. JOHN W. CLANCY, DISTRICT JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT
209 F.2d 958
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1954)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
There is uncertainty as to our power to act in the premises; but wo are clear that the state court of first instance or on appeal has full authority to settle the issue as to the validity of the service of process upon defendant Chaplin. See N. Y.Civil Practice Act, § 237-a(4); 17th Ann.Rep.N.Y. Judicial Council 62, 63 (1951). That tribunal, we believe, is now the appropriate one for all adjudication in the premises.
The petition is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corp., 349 U.S. 85 (U.S. 1955)
-
United States v. Nielson, 349 U.S. 129 (U.S. 1955)
-
North River Barge Line v. Chile S. S. Co., Inc., 213 F.2d 882 (2d Cir. 1954)