PARELMAN
v.
PARELMAN
PARELMAN
PARELMAN
210 F.2d 29
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1954)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 38 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
In this suit a mother charged her son with negligence which she alleged was the proximate cause of personal injuries sustained by her, for which she sought damages in the sum of $25,000. The mother complains on appeal that the trial judge erred in directing a verdict for the defendant at the close of her counsel’s opening statement to the jury.
We think the judge correctly concluded, from what the plaintiff’s counsel said he expected to prove, that a cause of action had not been stated.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (37 total)
-
Tillman v. United States, 406 F.2d 930 (5th Cir. 1969)
-
United States v. Mayo Perez, 489 F.2d 51 (5th Cir. 1973)
-
United States v. Skillman, 442 F.2d 542 (8th Cir. 1971)
Previewing 3 of 37 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence