MARC DUCLOS, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Whitehead v. State, 446 So. 2d 194 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)
  …e sentence without stating the grounds for retention with sufficient particularity. We find that any error which may have occurred was not preserved for appellate review. Not being of fundamental proportions it was thereby waived. McFadden v. State, 423 So. 2d 456 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Hernandez v. State, 425 So. 2d 213 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). The final error of which appellant complains, and to which we add an observation of our own, concerns the appropriateness here of mandatory minimum sentences. Appellant w…
• Bennie Lee Walker v. State, 442 So. 2d 977 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
  …State, 376 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Roberts v. State, 402 So. 2d 1364 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). To preserve this procedural error on appeal, it was necessary that Walker object in the trial court. Sawyer, supra; Alexander, supra; McFadden v. State, 423 So. 2d 456 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Smith v. State, 378 So. 2d 313 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). He did not. Gonzalez v. State, 392 So. 2d 334 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), does not conflict with nor control the decision in this case. The sentence imposed by the trial court in Gonz…
• Sye Christopher Jenkins v. State, 448 So. 2d 1060 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)
  …statute; however, the point is not preserved for appellate purposes because appellant made no objection at the time, Whitehead, v. State, 446 So. 2d 194 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Hernandez v. State, 425 So. 2d 213 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); McFadden v. State, 423 So. 2d 456 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), and because the error is not of fundamental proportions. Whitehead, supra. Accordingly, we do not disturb the sentence insofar as it maintains circuit court jurisdiction over the appellant for the first third of that sentence. T…

Authorities Cited

• State v. Rios, 409 So. 2d 241 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)