CHEMICAL BANK & TRUST COMPANY, PETITIONER,
v.
HONORABLE EDWARD J. DIMOCK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE, RESPONDENT
CHEMICAL BANK & TRUST COMPANY, PETITIONER,
HONORABLE EDWARD J. DIMOCK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE, RESPONDENT
210 F.2d 376
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1954)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
[*377] PER CURIAM.
Petitioner charges that Judge Dimock disregarded our mandate in Bernstein v. N. V. Nederlandsehe-Amerikaansche Stoomvaart-Maatschappij (Chemical Bank & Trust Co.), 2 Cir., 173 F. 2d 71, 75-76, but since we have amended our mandate in this case, 2 Cir., 210 F. 2d 375, we find it unnecessary to pass on the validity of the petitioner’s contentions or the propriety of resort to mandamus.
Petition denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398 (U.S. 1964)
Authorities Cited
- Bernstein v. N. V. Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche Stoomvaart-Maatschappij (Chemical Bank & Tr. Co., 210 F.2d 375 (2d Cir. 1954)
- Bernstein v. N. V. Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche Stoomvaart - Maatschappij (Chemical Bank & Tr. Co., 173 F.2d 71 (2d Cir. 1949)