HAMILTON ET AL.
v.
POLK
HAMILTON ET AL.
POLK
211 F.2d 51
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1954)
Caution
Cited by 61 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellants seek reversal of a judgment entered against them in a personal injury suit. We find no merit either in their main contention that the trial court abused its discretion in denying their motions to set aside the jury’s verdict and to grant a new trial on the grounds of fraud and newly discovered evidence, or in the other contentions urged for reversal.
The judgment is therefore
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (60 total)
-
Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Fed. Mar. Comm'n, 390 U.S. 261 (U.S. 1968)
-
Fed. Mar. Bd. v. Isbrandtsen Co., Inc., 356 U.S. 481 (U.S. 1958)
-
Env't Def. Fund v. Ruckelshaus, 439 F.2d 584 (D.C. Cir. 1971)
Previewing 3 of 60 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence