FININVEST INVESTMENTS, LTD., AND OFFICES BY THE SEA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., APPELLANTS,

v.

METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY AND MALVOLIO, N.V., A NETHERLANDS ANTILLES CORPORATION, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Roberts v. State, 512 So. 2d 286 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
  …ly, we affirm the probation revocation order under review, but direct that the subject order be modified on remand so as to conform to the oral findings of the trial court. See Bexley v. State, 490 So. 2d 226, 228 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Brown v. State, 423 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Affirmed and remanded for modification.…
• Brown v. State, 728 So. 2d 758 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)
  …court erred in denying a special jury instruction. We conclude, however, that the matter was adequately covered in the standard jury instructions and thus the trial court did not err by rejecting defendant’s special instruction. See Brown v. State, 423 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). . The issue was preserved by the defendant in the fashion set forth in Longshore v. Fronrath [*759] Chevrolet, Inc., 527 So. 2d 922, 923 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). . The trial court, after questioning other prospects, returned to Mer…
• Donald & Bales Exterminating, Inc. v. State, 487 So. 2d 78 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)
  …order appealed from and ... cannot be at issue before this court.” A defendant, nevertheless, has the right to have a sentence clarified when there is a conflict between the oral imposition of a sentence and the written sentence. See Brown v. State, 423 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Robinson v. State, 407 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Tory v. State, 391 So. 2d 743 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). Although the language in the written order of probation at bar does not contain the restrictions reflected in the court's…

Authorities Cited

• Warnock v. Fla. Hotel & Rest. Comm'n, 178 So. 2d 917 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)
• Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Maddox, 242 So. 2d 165 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)
• Thurman v. State, 293 So. 2d 366 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974)