HARRISON W. JOHNSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida First District Court of Appeal reversed Harrison Johnson's second degree murder conviction because the trial court failed to instruct the jury that it could convict of the lesser included offense of third degree murder. The court found sufficient evidence of aggravated battery as an underlying felony to support a third degree murder instruction under the revised procedural rules.
The trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury on third degree murder. Under Florida Rule 3.490 as amended effective October 1, 1981, a jury instruction on third degree murder is required when there is evidence supporting it. The evidence of aggravated battery resulting from the repeated hitting and kicking was sufficient to support a third degree murder instruction.
[1] A trial court must instruct the jury on all degrees of a charged offense when the information or indictment charges an offense divided into degrees, even if there is no e…
[2] Under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.490 as amended effective October 1, 1981, a jury instruction on a lesser degree of an offense is required only if there is evid…
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Rule 3.490, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, prior to October 1,1981, provided that when the information or indictment charges an offense which is divided into degrees, the court "shall in all such cases" charge the jury as to the degrees of the offense.”
Establishes the original procedural requirement for jury instructions on all degrees of an offense.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJohnson repeatedly hit and kicked the victim, causing severe injuries including a fractured hyoid bone. Medical evidence showed injuries consistent wi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Degrees Of Murder cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We reverse appellant’s conviction of second degree murder, based upon the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury that the appellant could be convicted of third degree murder. Murder is an offense divided into degrees.
Rule 3.490, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, prior to October 1,1981, provided that when the information or indictment charges an offense which is divided into degrees, the court “shall in all such cases” charge the jury as to the degrees of the offense. This rule required an instruction on the degrees of the offense, even if there was no evidence of the lesser degree.
However, by amendment effective October 1, 1981, Rule 3.490 was amended so as to provide that the judge “shall not instruct on any degree as to which there is no evidence.” Under the revised rule, as well as the revised jury instructions in criminal cases, a jury instruction on third degree murder was required in this case only if there was evidence of that offense. See, In The Matter Of The Use By The Trial Courts Of The Standard Jury Instructions In Criminal Cases, etc., [1981 FLW 305], case nos. 56,734 and 58,799, opinion filed April 16, 1981. The State concedes this, but contends that there is no evidence which would support a third degree murder conviction.
We disagree.
The appellant’s repeated hitting and kicking of the victim clearly constitutes battery as defined by Section 784.03(1), Florida Statutes. Considering the severity of the injuries suffered by the victim as testified to by the doctors, the evidence would also be sufficient to show “great bodily harm,” which will support a conviction of aggravated battery under Section 784.045(l)(a), Florida Statutes. Defense counsel suggested at trial that battery or aggravated battery were underlying felonies sufficient to support a third degree murder finding. This court has so recognized. Webb v. State, 410 So. 2d 944 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Harper v. State, 386 So. 2d 808 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).
The error in failing to give the charge is reversible, not harmless. See, Hunter v. State, 389 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).
No reversible error occurred with respect to the trial court’s rulings on the testimony of the pathologist.
We agree, as argued by appellee, that the pathologist did not testify as to how the victim’s injuries were inflicted. The doctor testified to the nature of the injuries, and that some of those injuries were consistent with a blow by a fist, but that others would require greater force and were consistent with a kick, or other trauma. He further opined that a fracture of the hyoid bone is consistent with steady, strong pressure, but not with a blow by a fist, or the edge of a hand. Nothing in the doctor’s testimony was inconsistent with appellant’s version of the offense. This testimony is not beyond the expertise of the pathologist, as was the testimony in Wright v. State, 348 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).
In view of our reversal on other grounds, it is unnecessary to address the contention that a sentencing error occurred because of a misconception on the part of both the state and the defense as to the minimum sentence the trial court was required to impose upon appellant.
REVERSED and REMANDED for new trial.
ERVIN, LARRY G. SMITH and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Green v. State, 475 So. 2d 235 (Fla. 1985)…urt of Appeal in Williams, a defendant charged with first-degree premeditated murder is entitled to an instruction on the lesser included offense of third-degree felony murder if there is evidence to support such a charge. See also Johnson v. State, 423 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). If there is no evidence to support a third-degree felony murder conviction, an instruction on the crime is not required. See Williams, 427 So. 2d at 776. In support of his claim that the third-degree felony murder instruction s…
-
Wiley v. State, 60 So. 3d 588 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)…ttery results in death, it can be third-degree murder. Sheridan v. State, 799 So. 2d 223, 225 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); see also Elkin v. State, 636 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Garcia v. State, 574 So. 2d 240, 241 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Johnson v. State, 423 So. 2d 614, 615 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). We find the evidence sufficient to sustain Wiley’s conviction for third-degree murder. Therefore, we vacate Wiley’s conviction for second-degree murder, and remand this matter to the trial court to sentence Wiley for his co…
-
Sheridan v. State, 799 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)…ial judge’s first inclination was correct. If an aggravated battery results in death, it can indeed be third-degree murder. See Elkin v. State, 636 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Garcia v. State, 574 So. 2d 240 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Johnson v. State, 423 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Further, if there is evidence supporting the lesser charge of third-degree murder, the defendant is entitled to such an instruction to the jury. Green v. State, 475 So. 2d 235, 237 (Fla.1985); Elkin, 636 So. 2d at 571; Garcia, 5…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Wright v. State, 348 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977)
- Hunter v. State, 389 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)
- Mallory Webb, III v. State, 410 So. 2d 944 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
- Harper v. State, 386 So. 2d 808 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980)