GUY EDMOND WEIR, APPELLANT,
v.
JEROME J. GORDON, APPELLEE
GUY EDMOND WEIR, APPELLANT,
JEROME J. GORDON, APPELLEE
216 F.2d 508
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (1954)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
In this action for copyright infringement the district court, 111 F.Supp. 117, found that the appellant made copies of the principal features of the appellee’s copyrighted advertising material, and caused the same to be published for his own profit. We find that the district court’s controlling findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and that the court correctly applied the law. Ansehl v. Puritan Pharmaceutical Co., 8 Cir., 1932, 61 F. 2d 131. It follows that the judgment of the district court should be and it hereby is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
SID & Marty Krofft Television Prods., Inc. v. McDONALD'S Corp. & Needham, 562 F.2d 1157 (9th Cir. 1977)
-
Peter PAN Fabrics, Inc. v. Jobela Fabrics, Inc., 329 F.2d 194 (2d Cir. 1964)
-
Lin-Brook Builders Hardware v. Gertler, 352 F.2d 298 (9th Cir. 1965)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Ansehl v. Puritan Pharm. Co., 61 F.2d 131 (8th Cir. 1932)