THE BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
CARL N. PEIGH, BUEL C. GRIFFIN AND OMAR A. SAFLY, APPELLEES
THE BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
CARL N. PEIGH, BUEL C. GRIFFIN AND OMAR A. SAFLY, APPELLEES
219 F.2d 764
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1955)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The defendant appeals from a judgment for the plaintiff, entered on a jury’s verdict, in a suit for personal injuries. We reversed a former judgment for the defendant. Peigh v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 92 U.S.App.D.C. 198, 204 F. 2d 391. The defendant’s contentions concern negligence, contributory negligence, proximate cause, and the admission and exclusion of evidence. We find no error affecting substantial rights.
Affirmed.
WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judge, dissents.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
World Ins. Co. v. Hall, 384 F.2d 138 (5th Cir. 1967)
Authorities Cited
- Peigh v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 204 F.2d 391 (D.C. Cir. 1953)