THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
BRUTUS LEWIS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
FINNEGAN, Circuit Judge.
Defendant, Lewis, was convicted below, after waiving a jury, for violating 21 U.S.C.A. § 174 and 26 U.S.C. § 2554 (a). He contends that the government’s evidence failed to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. We disagree. United States v. Aman, 7 Cir., 1954, 210 F. 2d 344, 349; United States v. Holmes, 7 Cir., 1951, 187 F. 2d 222. It would neither aid defendant, nor do more than accumulate precedent on well-settled principles, to detail all the facts we encountered canvassing this record. We are satisfied reversible errors are absent and fundamental rights unimpaired.
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ross v. Steamship Zeeland, 240 F.2d 820 (4th Cir. 1957)
-
Huff v. Matson Navigation Co., 338 F.2d 205 (9th Cir. 1964)
-
Adams v. United States & Cal. Stevedore & Ballast Co., 393 F.2d 903 (9th Cir. 1968)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- United States v. Aman, 210 F.2d 344 (7th Cir. 1954)
- United States v. Holmes, 187 F.2d 222 (7th Cir. 1951)