CANAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
E. T. TRANTHAM, APPELLEE
CANAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,
E. T. TRANTHAM, APPELLEE
220 F.2d 752
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (1955)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on for hearing on the record and on the briefs and oral arguments of attorneys for the parties;
And it appearing that the issue presented is on the appeal by the insurer in a fire insurance policy from a judgment for $17,851.63 entered in favor of its insured;
And this court, after due consideration, having reached the conclusion that the judgment entered in the district court should be affirmed for the reasons recited in the well done opinion of Judge Taylor, 117 F.Supp. 241, wherein he has cited the controlling Tennessee authorities;
The judgment is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. Zernie Newman, Jr., 243 F.2d 804 (6th Cir. 1957)
-
Cleary v. Ind. Beach, Inc., 275 F.2d 543 (7th Cir. 1960)
-
Coakwell v. United States, 292 F.2d 918 (Ct. Cl. 1961)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence