THOMAS FERWERDA AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLANTS,
v.
CHARLES A. COAKWELL, JR., APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
This appeal from the dismissal by the district court of a complaint involving the issuance of a patent came on to be heard and has been considered upon the record and upon the oral arguments and briefs of the attorneys for the contending parties;
And it appearing from the two opinions filed by District Judge McNamee, 121 F.Supp. 334, that the action was filed two days too late under the applicable statute, section 146 of Public Law No. 593, 82nd Congress, 35 U.S.C.A. § 146, and that the rules, 35 U.S.C.A.Appendix, promulgated by the commissioner pursuant to such Act relied upon by ap pellants are applicable solely to proceedings in the Patent Office and not to actions in the United States District Court;
The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the sound reasons given in its aforementioned two opinions.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. Zernie Newman, Jr., 243 F.2d 804 (6th Cir. 1957)
-
Cleary v. Ind. Beach, Inc., 275 F.2d 543 (7th Cir. 1960)
-
Coakwell v. United States, 292 F.2d 918 (Ct. Cl. 1961)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence