THE FURR COMPANY, APPELLANT,

v.

MAGALY SADIN AND ENGRACIA SADIN, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Mansfield v. State, 430 So. 2d 586 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)
  …from other sources. Id. at 1160. After remand, the evidentiary hearing revealed that several local agencies would have furnished clothing upon request. Therefore, the trial court did not compel Topley to go to trial in jail clothes. Topley v. State, 424 So. 2d 81 (Fla. [*589] 4th DCA 1982). We see no need for another evidentiary' hearing and affirm on this issue. Appellant had the same access to clothing from local agencies as did Topley. Appellant may wish to use these local clothing resources before retria…
• Rodriguez v. State, 259 So. 3d 846 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018)
  …d again renewed the request that the State provide clothing. He alleged that he was indigent, in custody, and had no money for clothes or family members that could provide him clothes. The trial court denied the motion, relying on Topley v. State, 424 So. 2d 81 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (“Topley II”), and Tarpley v. Dugger, 841 F. 2d 359 (11th Cir. 1988). The trial court also concluded that Eberhardt was not controlling and the State is not required to provide a defendant with civilian clothing for trial. On Ja…
• Donnie Tarpley v. Dugger, 841 F.2d 359 (11th Cir. 1988)
  …the state trial court concluded that Tarpley had not been compelled by the State to wear prison garb because he could have obtained suitable clothing to wear at his trial. The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed this judgment. Topley v. State, 424 So. 2d 81 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). On April 13,1984, Tarpley filed a petition for post-conviction relief in the state trial court pursuant to Rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure alleging that his sentence for the offense of criminal mischief vi…

Authorities Cited

• Mercury Motors Express, Inc. v. Smith, 393 So. 2d 545 (Fla. 1981)
• Taco Bell OF California v. Zappone, 324 So. 2d 121 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)
• Willern Koblinski v. Koblinski, 339 So. 2d 266 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)