JOSE DIOGO, APPELLANT,
v.
T. J. HOLLAND, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE
JOSE DIOGO, APPELLANT,
T. J. HOLLAND, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE
221 F.2d 806
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (1955)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The sole question raised on.this appeal has now been decided .in .favor of the appellant by-the Supreme Court in the case of Shaughnessy v. Pedreiro, 75 S.Ct. 591 overruling the decision of. this court .to the contrary in Paolo v. Garfinkel, 3 Cir., 1952, 200 F. 2d 280; Upon the authority of the Pedreiro case the order of the district court dismissing the complaint for want of jurisdiction will be reversed and the cause will be remanded with directions to reinstate the complaint.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gill v. Commissioner OF Internal Revenue, 306 F.2d 902 (5th Cir. 1962)
-
da Cruz v. Holland, 222 F.2d 263 (3d Cir. 1955)
-
Costa v. Holland, 222 F.2d 263 (3d Cir. 1955)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Shaughnessy v. Pedreiro, 349 U.S. 48 (U.S. 1955)
- Paolo v. Garfinkel, 200 F.2d 280 (3d Cir. 1952)