FRANK BASIL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
ALBERT J. CYR, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, BUREAU OF EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION, NINTH COMPENSATION DISTRICT, AND GRAIN HANDLING COMPANY, INC., AND THE STATE INSURANCE FUND, INSURANCE CARRIER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
FRANK BASIL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
ALBERT J. CYR, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, BUREAU OF EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION, NINTH COMPENSATION DISTRICT, AND GRAIN HANDLING COMPANY, INC., AND THE STATE INSURANCE FUND, INSURANCE CARRIER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
221 F.2d 957
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1955)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the opinion below, filed on September 23, 1954. While plaintiff gave some testimony on cross-examination, in addition to the quotation from his direct examination, which Judge Knight describes as the “sole evidence” of the alleged telephone conversation on April 30, 1951, this in no way alters the result.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kozak v. Administrator, 278 F.2d 104 (8th Cir. 1960)
-
Wilhelm Reich v. United States, 239 F.2d 134 (1st Cir. 1956)
-
Diamond v. Carmine A. Bucci, 732 F.2d 17 (1st Cir. 1984)