HY GOLDBAUM, GEORGE CAPRI AND EDWARD COOKE, APPELLANTS,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court's former decision was correct and is affirmed.
The case was remanded by the Supreme Court for reexamination in light of net worth method decisions. The Ninth Circuit's prior decision affirmed the d…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Net Worth Method cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
As required by the Supreme Court’s order of January 10, 1955, 348 U.S. 905, 75 S.Ct. 311, remanding this and other cases, we have considered this case in the light of Holland v. United States, 348 U.S. 121, 75 S.Ct. 127; Friedberg v. United States, 348 U.S. 142, 75 S.Ct. 138; Smith v. United States, 348 U.S. 147, 75 S.Ct. 194, and United States v. Calderon, 348 U.S. 160, 75 S.Ct. 186.
The Supreme Court’s order recited, 348 U.S. 906, 75 S.Ct. 311, 312: “We have not considered the merits of these cases, nor have we determined their relation to our recent opinions, supra, believing that reexamination by the Courts of Appeals is desirable even in those cases remotely involving the principles laid down in the net worth decisions.”
A reexamination by this court discloses that this is indeed a case only remotely involving the net worth problem. As appears from our former decision 9 Cir., 204 F. 2d 74, the district court’s judgment was affirmed upon the ground that the proof of guilt under count 13 was sufficient. Proof under that count did not involve use of the net worth method of proof. We therefore conclude that our former decision was correct.
Judgment affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Elwert v. United States, 231 F.2d 928 (9th Cir. 1956)
Authorities Cited
- Holland et ux. v. United States, 348 U.S. 121 (U.S. 1954)
- Smith v. United States, 348 U.S. 147 (U.S. 1954)
- United States v. Calderon, 348 U.S. 160 (U.S. 1954)
- Friedberg v. United States, 348 U.S. 142 (U.S. 1954)
- Goldbaum v. United States, 348 U.S. 905 (U.S. 1955)
- Goldbaum v. United States, 204 F.2d 74 (9th Cir. 1953)
- Lachman v. City of Miami Beach, 348 U.S. 906 (U.S. 1955)