JOHN FELIX ESPOSITO, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1982-12-30
No. 81-1041
HOBSON, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and LEHAN, JJ., concur.
424 So. 2d 160 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1982) Negative Treatment
Cited by 6 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the briefs and record on appeal, we find the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error; therefore, the judgments appealed are affirmed. However, we remand this cause to the trial court to correct imperfections in the sentence.

The written judgment and sentence recites that appellant was sentenced to a term of five years imprisonment on count I (conspiracy to traffic in methaqualone in excess of two hundred grams) and to ten years imprisonment on count II (delivery of methaqualone). Since the record of the sentencing hearing indicates that the court sentenced appellant to ten years imprisonment on count I and five years imprisonment on count II, the written judgment and sentence must be corrected to conform with the court’s oral pronouncement at sentencing.

Remanded for correction of the sentence, otherwise, affirmed. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

HOBSON, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and LEHAN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Benny King Thomas v. State, 432 So. 2d 202 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)
    …ly adjudged insolvent, this was error. Brown v. State, 427 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983) (question certified). Also, the record erro [*203] neously fails to contain a written sentence conforming to the foregoing oral sentence. See Esposito v. State, 424 So. 2d 160 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). Accordingly, we AFFIRM appellant’s conviction, STRIKE the ordered costs, and REMAND for the addition of a written sentence which conforms to the trial court’s oral pronouncement. OTT, C.J., and BOARDMAN, J., concur.…
  • Manganelli v. State, 582 So. 2d 826 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)
    …364 days in the county jail as a special condition of probation. The written sentence erroneously reflects that the appellant serve 364 days followed by five years on probation. The appellant need not be present for this purpose. Esposito v. State, 424 So. 2d 160 (Fla.2d DCA 1982). DANAHY, A.C.J., and FRANK and HALL, JJ., concur.…
  • Burkey v. State, 582 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)
    …either count, it did so in the subsequent written orders of probation and community control. Therefore, we remand for the court to make these corrections on the written orders. Williams v. State, 542 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Esposito v. State, 424 So. 2d 160 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). [*1253] Otherwise, we affirm the defendant’s sentence of six months’ community control and four and one-half years’ probation. FRANK and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw