EMERSON G. SHOCKLEY, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
EMERSON G. SHOCKLEY, APPELLANT,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
224 F.2d 557
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1955)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The district court denied appellant’s claim for damages allegedly resulting from a heat stroke sustained while he was serving in an unsafe place aboard the S.S.T.E. Mitchell, a cargo Liberty ship owned and operated by appellee. The decisive issues are solely questions of fact, which were determined in ap- pellee’s favor after a full and fair trial. We have reviewed the voluminous record, in the light of able arguments and briefs of counsel, and we are unable to say that the findings of fact by the district court are erroneous, certainly not clearly erroneous. See McAllister v. United States, 348 U.S. 19, 20, 75 S.Ct. 6.
The judgment is therefore Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Manning v. State, 167 So. 2d 616 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964)
-
Ionion S.S. Co. of Athens v. United Distillers of Am., Inc., 236 F.2d 78 (5th Cir. 1956)
Authorities Cited
- McALLISTER v. United States, 348 U.S. 19 (U.S. 1954)
- In re Disbarment of Isserman, 348 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1954)