PATRICK ANTONY STEWART A/K/A PATRICK ANTHONY, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PATRICK ANTONY STEWART A/K/A PATRICK ANTHONY, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
425 So. 2d 627
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1983)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. State v. Britton, 387 So. 2d 556, 558 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Hudson v. State, 353 So. 2d 633 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Downriver Internists v. Harris Corp., 929 F.2d 1147 (6th Cir. 1991)…tract, privity must be shown before the Center may recover on the breach of warranty claim. See Adee v. Great Southeast Carpet Gallery, Inc., 562 So. 2d 409 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1990) (lack of privity precluded recovery); Whitehead v. Rizón East Ass’n., 425 So. 2d 627, 629 (Fla. Dist.Ct.App.1983) (“privity is essential to the claims based on warranty”). In both cases, the negotiations prior to signing of the contracts did not involve the Center. Although the contracts indicate that the equipment was to be shippe…
Authorities Cited
- Allied Lumber Co., Inc. v. U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co. & the Home Ins. Co., 353 So. 2d 633 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
- State v. Britton, 387 So. 2d 556 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980)