NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER,
v.
DAVID G. LEACH AND DOYLE H. WALLACE, DOING BUSINESS AS BROOKVILLE GLOVE COMPANY, RESPONDENTS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the National Labor Relations Board's order was correct and supported by the record, granting enforcement.
The company sent letters to striking employees threatening termination if they did not return by a specific date, and later sent termination notices. …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Nlrb Enforcement Proceedings cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This is a petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board. One of the points in the case was the legality of a strike by employees who sought recognition of a Union which had not filed the required affidavits. This point disappears in view of the Supreme Court decision in United Mine Workers of America v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co., 1956, 351 U.S. 62, 76 S.Ct. 559.
During the course of the strike the company sent out a letter to its employees stating:
“* * * we will welcome you back to your job providing you return by 6:50 A.M. on Thursday, September 17 th. After That Date You Will No Longer Be Considered An Employee. [Capitals in original.]”
This was followed up three days later by a notification to all who were still on strike that “we are sending you as an enclosure the customary termination notice. Your name has been removed from the payroll * * *.” The sig nificance of such a letter has already been settled in this Court. National Labor Relations Board v. Beaver Meadow Creamery, Inc., 3 Cir., 1954, 215 F. 2d 247. See also National Labor Relations Board v. United States Cold Storage Corp., 5 Cir., 1953, 203 F. 2d 924, cer-tiorari denied Oct. 12, 1953, 346 U.S. 818, 74 S.Ct. 30, 98 L.Ed. 344.
While the trial examiner recommended a back pay order from the time of the notification just quoted, the Board made back pay orders effective as of the date when the strike ended.
There are no new legal points involved in the case. The Board was correct in its law and sustained in its facts by the record. The petition for enforcement will be granted.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Morris Fishman & Sons, Inc., 278 F.2d 792 (3d Cir. 1960)
Authorities Cited
- United Mine Workers of Am. v. Ark. Oak Flooring Co., 351 U.S. 62 (U.S. 1956)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United States Cold Storage Corp., 203 F.2d 924 (5th Cir. 1953)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Beaver Meadow Creamery, Inc., 215 F.2d 247 (3d Cir. 1954)
- United States Cold Storage Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 346 U.S. 818 (U.S. 1953)
- Rockwell Mfg. Co. v. The Stanley Works, 346 U.S. 818 (U.S. 1953)