MARVIN J. RAPPAPORT, APPELLANT,
v.
HERMAN FINESOD AND HARRIS SHAPIRO, APPELLEES
MARVIN J. RAPPAPORT, APPELLANT,
HERMAN FINESOD AND HARRIS SHAPIRO, APPELLEES
425 So. 2d 646
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1983)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Scott v. City of Tampa, 158 Fla. 712, 30 So. 2d 300, cert. denied, 332 U.S. 790, 68 S.Ct. 99, 92 L.Ed.2d 372 (1947); Hunt v. First National Bank of Tampa, 381 So. 2d 1194 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Fewox v. Tallahassee Bank & Trust Co., 249 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied, 252 So. 2d 799 (Fla.1971).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Maillard v. Dowdell, 528 So. 2d 512 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)…ept these allegations as true. Copeland v. Celotex Corp., 447 So. 2d 908 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), quashed on other grounds, 471 So. 2d 533 (Fla.1985); Emile v. Florida Power & Light Co., 426 So. 2d 1152 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Dunnell v. Malone & Hyde, Inc., 425 So. 2d 646 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). The fundamental question a court must consider in ruling on a motion to dismiss is whether by proving the allegations in the complaint the plaintiff would establish a cause of action against the defendant. Dykema v. Godfrey, 467…
-
Copeland v. The Celotex Corp., 447 So. 2d 908 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)…ts consideration to the allegations found within the four corners of the complaint. Pizzi v. Central Bank & Trust Co., 250 So. 2d 895 (Fla.1971); Emile v. Florida Power & Light Co., 426 So. 2d 1152 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Dunnell v. Malone & Hyde, Inc., 425 So. 2d 646 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). A motion to dismiss is not a substitute for a motion for summary judgment. Dunnell; see Pizzi. All allegations in the complaint must be accepted as true, Emile; Dunnell; Kaufman v. A-l Bus Lines, 363 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978);…
-
R.F. Thompson v. P.W. Martin, 530 So. 2d 495 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)…ause of action, the appellee’s motion to dismiss advanced several additional arguments as to why the appellant’s action should be dismissed. A motion to dismiss is not a substitute for a motion for summary judgment, Dunnell v. Malone and Hyde, Inc., 425 So. 2d 646 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), and in ruling on a motion to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a cause of action, we are confined to a consideration of the allegations found within the four corners of the complaint. Bricker v. Kay, 446 So. 2d 1151 (Fla.…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Hunt v. First Nat'l Bank OF Tampa, 381 So. 2d 1194 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980)
- Scott v. City OF Tampa, 158 Fla. 712 (Fla. 1947)
- Fewox v. The Tallahassee Bank & Tr. Co., 249 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971)
- Belcher v. Lines, 252 So. 2d 799 (Fla. 1971)
- Bennett v. Halper, 252 So. 2d 799 (Fla. 1971)
- St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Cent. Hanover Bank & Tr. Co., 332 U.S. 790 (U.S. 1947)
- G. H. Love, Inc. v. Fleming, 332 U.S. 790 (U.S. 1947)