CONSOLIDATED ALUMINUM CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
HORACE L. HUNTT AND EVELYN HUNTT, HIS WIFE, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the award of punitive damages was unsupported by evidence of willful and wanton disregard for safety, while the compensatory damages award was affirmed.
A plaintiff was injured when a ladder slipped, and a jury found the ladder not defective but awarded both compensatory and punitive damages, attributi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Comparative Negligence cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff was injured in 1979 when the ladder he was using slipped while being used contrary to the instructions on the label, (which the plaintiff admitted he did not read). The ladder was manufactured by the defendant in 1973.
The jury returned a verdict finding that the ladder was not defective when it left the defendant’s plant. The jury verdict also found that the plaintiff was 75% negligent and the defendant 25% negligent and awarded the plaintiff $10,000.00 compensatory damages and $60,000.00 punitive damages. Even though the verdict may have been inconsistent, no objection was made in the trial court as to the inconsistency and no error has been preserved in this regard. Keller Industries, Inc., v. Morgart, 412 So. 2d 950 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); Robbins v. Graham, 404 So. 2d 769 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Tidwell v. Toca, 362 So. 2d 85 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).
We find no basis in this record to support the award of punitive damages. There is no evidence that the defendant acted in any manner to demonstrate a willful and wanton disregard for the safety of prospective users of the ladder. American Motors Corporation v. Ellis, 403 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Auto Specialties Manufacturing Company v. Boutwell, 335 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).
Therefore, the final judgment under review is affirmed as to the award of $10,-000.00 compensatory damages but reversed as to the $60,000.00 award of punitive damages.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Am. Motors Corp. v. Ellis, 403 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)
- Robbins v. Graham, 404 So. 2d 769 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)
- Tidwell v. Toca, 362 So. 2d 85 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
- Keller Indus., Inc. v. Morgart, 412 So. 2d 950 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)
- Auto Specialties Mfg. Co. & the Travelers Ins. Co. v. Boutwell, 335 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)
- Polk v. State, 412 So. 2d 950 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)