NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER,
v.
TENNESSEE COACH COMPANY, RESPONDENT

6th Cir. | 1956-10-30
No. 12846
Before MARTIN, MILLER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
237 F.2d 907 United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (1956) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board. The only substantive question presented is whether the respondent could lawfully refuse to bargain with a union six weeks after it had been certified as bargaining representative, for the reason that a majority of the employees had signed a petition stating that they were not members of the union, “and we do not want this union, or any other organization to represent us as our collective bargaining agent.”

Despite factual distinctions pointed out by the respondent, we are of the opinion that the Supreme Court’s decision in Brooks v. National Labor Relations Board, 1954, 348 U.S. 96, 75 S.Ct. 176, 99 L.Ed. 125, is dispositive of the question presented. We are also of the opinion that the form and scope of the Board’s order is not improper. See May Department Stores Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1945, 326 U.S. 376, 392-393, 66 S.Ct. 203, 90 L.Ed. 145; National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co., 1941, 312 U.S. 426, 438-439, 61 S.Ct. 693, 85 L.Ed. 930.

It is therefore ordered that the order of the National Labor Relations Board be and it hereby is enforced.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw