WILLIAM L. CLAY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
DOMINION OF CANADA, DEFENDANT; WILLIAM L. CLAY, JR., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. DOMINION OF CANADA, DEFENDANT; ANGELO R. SANTORA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. HER MAJESTY, ELIZABETH, AS OF RIGHT QUEEN OF CANADA, AND CANADA, DEFENDANTS; ARTHUR SHAUGHNESSY AND ANNE SHAUGHNESSY, PLAINTIFFIS-APPELLANTS, V. HER MAJESTY, ELIZABETH, QUEEN OF CANADA, AND CANADA, DEFENDANTS
WILLIAM L. CLAY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
DOMINION OF CANADA, DEFENDANT; WILLIAM L. CLAY, JR., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. DOMINION OF CANADA, DEFENDANT; ANGELO R. SANTORA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. HER MAJESTY, ELIZABETH, AS OF RIGHT QUEEN OF CANADA, AND CANADA, DEFENDANTS; ARTHUR SHAUGHNESSY AND ANNE SHAUGHNESSY, PLAINTIFFIS-APPELLANTS, V. HER MAJESTY, ELIZABETH, QUEEN OF CANADA, AND CANADA, DEFENDANTS
238 F.2d 400
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1956)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Judgments affirmed in open court. 144 F.Supp. 746.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Petition of Petrol Shipping Corp., 360 F.2d 103 (2d Cir. 1966)
-
Green v. United States, 334 F.2d 733 (1st Cir. 1964)
-
The Purdy Co. v. Argentina, 333 F.2d 95 (7th Cir. 1964)
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence