BEAVER PIPE TOOLS, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
THOMAS M. CAREY, APPELLEE (TWO CASES)
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Interest paid on preferred debentures without a fixed maturity date, issued in exchange for preferred stock, is not deductible as interest on indebtedness under 26 U.S.C. § 23(b).
The taxpayer, Beaver Pipe Tools, Inc., paid interest on preferred debentures issued in exchange for its preferred stock. These debentures had no fixed…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Deductibility Of Interest Payments cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
On this appeal by the taxpayer, Beaver Pipe Tools, Inc., from the decision of the district court dismissing its complaint, the issue is whether interest paid by the taxpayer on preferred debentures having no fixed maturity date, issued by the taxpayer in exchange for its outstanding cumulative preferred stock, is deductible as interest paid on indebtedness within the meaning of 26 U.S.C. § 23(b).
United States District Judge Paul Jones, in a succinct and logical opinion, held that interest so paid is not deductible. He considered that the maturity date of the preferred debentures, being “ ‘upon liquidation of the company’ ”, did not constitute “a ‘fixed date’ ” or a certain time, as required by the aforementioned statute and the regulation promulgated thereunder. [139 F.Supp. 472].
We are in accord with his reasoning. In addition to having no fixed maturity date, the debentures in question were not issued for new capital, had a face value nearly ten times the stockholders’ equity, and were junior to the claims of general creditors. We find on the whole record that no other point presented by appellant has been established to gainsay the correctness of the decision of the district court.
Accordingly, the order dismissing the taxpayer’s complaint is ordered to be affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
P. M. Fin. Corp. v. Commissioner OF Internal Revenue, 302 F.2d 786 (3d Cir. 1962)
-
Farley Realty Corp. v. Commissioner OF Internal Revenue, 279 F.2d 701 (2d Cir. 1960)