REVEREND MERLE E. PARKER, D.D., APPELLANT,
v.
ARTHUR E. SUMMERFIELD, POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, APPELLEE
REVEREND MERLE E. PARKER, D.D., APPELLANT,
ARTHUR E. SUMMERFIELD, POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, APPELLEE
243 F.2d 42
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1957)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed, appellant not having exhausted his administrative remedies. Cadillac Publishing Co. v. Summerfield, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 14, 227 F. 2d 29, cer-tiorari denied, 1955, 350 U.S. 901, 76 S.Ct. 179, 100 L.Ed. 791.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rev. Merle E. Parker v. Summerfield, 265 F.2d 359 (D.C. Cir. 1959)
Authorities Cited
- A/S J. Ludwig Mowinckels Rederi v. Amador, 350 U.S. 901 (U.S. 1955)
- Morris v. United States, 350 U.S. 901 (U.S. 1955)
- Cadillac Publ'g Co., Inc. v. Summerfield, 227 F.2d 29 (D.C. Cir. 1955)