THE COLONY, INC., PETITIONER,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT

6th Cir. | 1957-04-22
No. 13008
244 F.2d 75 United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (1957) Negative Treatment
Cited by 10 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The five-year statute of limitations contained in section 275(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 is applicable when an understatement of gross income results from an overstatement of the basis of property sold.


Facts & Procedural History

A real estate corporation's income tax returns showed understatements of gross income exceeding 25% due to an erroneous overstatement of the basis of …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*76] PER CURIAM.

The sole question on this review is whether the five-year statute of limitations contained in section 275(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C.A. § 275(c) was applicable, in this case, as the Tax Court held.1

The petitioner is a corporation dealing in real estate. Its income tax returns for the years in question contained understatements of gross income of more than twenty-five per cent resulting from an erroneous overstatement of the basis 'of land sold, rather than from any omission of gross receipts. Under these circumstances it is the petitioner’s contention that the general three-year limitation pé’riód of section 275(a) of the 1939 'Code-is applicable. As petitioner’s counsel correctly points out, the decisions of 'the Courts of Appeals of several other "circuits give clear support to this view. Uptegrove Lumber Co. v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 1953, 204 F. 2d 570; Deakman-Wells Co. v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 1954, 213 F. 2d 894; Goodenow v. Commissioner, 8 Cir., 1956, 238 F. 2d 20; cf. Slaff v. Commissioner, 9 Cir., 1955, 220 F. 2d 65; Davis v. Hightower, 5 Cir., 1956, 230 F. 2d 549.

The reasoning of these cases is not without considerable persuasive force, and if the question were here for the first time, we might be disposed to follow them. However, the question has already been decided by this court in Reis v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 1944, 142 F. 2d 900, where it was held that the five-year limitation was applicable when the taxpayer’s understatement of gross income of inoré than twenty-five per cent was the result of his overstatement of the cost basis of property sold. The facts in the !Reis, case. ar.e, of course, not identical with the facts in the present case, but the issue presented is the same.

‘ Upon the authority of Reis v. Commissioner. the decision of the Tax Court is affirmed.

. “(c) Omission from gross income. If f ¡the taxpayer omits from gross income an amount properly includible therein which is in excess Of '25 per centum of the amount of gross income stated in the return, the tax may be assessed, or a proceeding in court for the collection of such tax may be begun without assessment, at any time within 5 years after the return was filed.”


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw