UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
JAMES BALLENTINE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
JAMES BALLENTINE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
245 F.2d 223
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1957)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
As the attorney assigned by us on March 25, 1957 has examined the transcript of the testimony at the trial and given the matter as a whole careful consideration and reports that he can find no merit whatever in the appeal and wishes to be relieved, we accede to his request.
Appellant’s application for the assignment of new counsel is denied. United States ex rel. Tierney v. Richmond, 2 Cir, 245 F. 2d 222.
Appellant’s motion for an extension of time within which to file a brief and appendix pro se is granted and he may file same at any time on or before September 1, 1957.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Local 450, Int'l Union OF Operating Eng'rs, AFL-CIO v. Elliott, 256 F.2d 630 (5th Cir. 1958)
-
Kennedy v. SAN Francisco-Oakland Newspaper Guild, 430 F.2d 317 (9th Cir. 1970)
-
United States ex rel. Carlos Rodriguez v. Jackson, 246 F.2d 730 (2d Cir. 1957)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- United States ex rel. John Tierney v. Richmond, 245 F.2d 222 (2d Cir. 1957)