GULF OIL CORP., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN FLORIDA, KEY INTERNATIONAL DRILLING CO., LTD., AND KEYDRIL CO., APPELLANTS,
v.
JANE POOLE, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF KENNETH POOLE, DECEASED, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1983-02-10
No. AP-70
ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C.J., LARRY G. SMITH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
426 So. 2d 1254 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1983) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida First District Court of Appeal reversed the trial court's denial of a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction as to Key International Drilling and Keydril, finding no basis for asserting jurisdiction under the long-arm statute, while affirming the denial of Gulf Oil's motion to dismiss for improper venue.


Holding

The court reversed the denial of the motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction as to Key International Drilling and Keydril, as there was no basis for asserting jurisdiction under the long-arm statute. The court affirmed the denial of Gulf Oil's motion to dismiss for improper venue, finding that proper venue existed in Walton County under Florida Statutes § 47.051.


Facts & Procedural History

Jane Poole, as personal representative of Kenneth Poole's estate, brought suit against Gulf Oil Corp., Key International Drilling Co., Ltd., and Keydr…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*1255] PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s order denying the motion to dismiss by Key International Drilling and Keydril for lack of personal jurisdiction is REVERSED and the case is remanded with instructions to dismiss the action against those defendants. The documents tendered to us in appellee’s appendix, in an effort to show that those corporations are “mere instrumentalities” of Gulf, are not shown to be part of the record below. Those documents, therefore, cannot refute appellants’ proof that there is no basis for asserting jurisdiction over Keydril and Key International Drilling under the long-arm statute. § 48.193, Fla.Stat. (1981); Hyco Manufacturing Co. v. Rotex International Corp., 355 So. 2d 471 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

The trial court’s order is AFFIRMED insofar as it denied the motion to dismiss by appellant Gulf for improper venue. The proof offered by Gulf does not negate the existence of proper venue in Walton County under section 47.051, Florida Statutes (1981), in the suit remaining against Gulf alone. See Inverness Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. McDaniel, 78 So. 2d 100, 102 (Fla.1955).

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C.J., LARRY G. SMITH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Weaver v. State, 543 So. 2d 443 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
    …y were marked for identification for admission into evidence. We cannot accept the filing of the reports as a supplement to the appellate record where those documents were never admitted into evidence at the probation hearing. Gulf Oil Co. v. Poole, 426 So. 2d 1254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). The remaining proof, relied upon by the State in support of the trial court’s finding of a violation, is hearsay evidence. Although hearsay evidence is admissible in a probation revocation hearing, a revocation cannot be based…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw