DONG WING OTT AND DONG WING HAN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
EDWARD J. SHAUGHNESSY, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF THE NEW YORK DISTRICT OF THE INUNIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
DONG WING OTT AND DONG WING HAN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
EDWARD J. SHAUGHNESSY, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF THE NEW YORK DISTRICT OF THE INUNIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
245 F.2d 875
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1957)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the opinion of District Judge Murphy below, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 142 F.Supp. 379; and see also Leng May Ma v. Barber, 9 Cir., 241 F. 2d 85, certiorari granted 77 S.Ct. 1283.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States ex rel. Gyula Paktorovics v. Murff, 260 F.2d 610 (2d Cir. 1958)
-
Dong Wing OTT and Dong Wing Han v. Shaughnessy, 247 F.2d 769 (2d Cir. 1957)
Authorities Cited
- Dong Wing Ott v. Shaughnessy, 350 U.S. 847 (U.S. 1955)
- United States v. Shaughnessy, 220 F.2d 537 (2d Cir. 1955)
- Leng MAY MA v. Barber, 241 F.2d 85 (9th Cir. 1957)
- Dong Wing OTT and Dong Wing Han v. Shaughnessy, 247 F.2d 769 (2d Cir. 1957)