GROVENE JAMES FINLEY, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the trial judge's actions were proper and that the defendant waived any claim regarding the alibi instruction by failing to object.
The appellant was convicted of possessing and transporting nontaxpaid distilled spirits. The trial judge sustained an objection to a hearsay question,…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Plain Error (Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(B)) cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals from his conviction of possessing and transporting nontaxpaid distilled spirits, 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 5008(b) (1), 5642.
The action of the trial judge in sustaining a prosecution objection to a question calling for an obviously hearsay answer was eminently proper in view of appellant’s inability to present any acceptable theory under which the answer would have been admissible. Horne v. United States, 5 Cir., 246 F. 2d 83. Actually, the particular question was answered anyway and no motion to strike was made or instruction to disregard given.
Appellant’s present complaint that no instruction was given to the jury on the defense of alibi does not require consideration by us since there was neither an objection nor a requested instruction at the trial. Fed.Rules Crim. Proc. rule 30, 18 U.S.C.A.; McDonald v. United States, 5 Cir., 200 F. 2d 502; White v. United States, 5 Cir., 200 F. 2d 509, certiorari denied 345 U.S. 999, 73 S.Ct. 1142, 97 L.Ed. 1405. Certainly on this record, where little or no evidence is present to support such a charge even if requested, and there is no basis for feeling that an injustice has been done it cannot be said that the failure of the Trial Judge to give it sua sponte is such a plain error as should be noticed under F.R.Crim.P. 52(b). See Williams v. United States, 5 Cir., 208 F. 2d 447, certiorari denied 347 U.S. 928, 74 S.Ct. 531, 98 L.Ed. 1081.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Roper v. United States, 403 F.2d 796 (5th Cir. 1968)
-
Smith v. United States, 252 F.2d 120 (5th Cir. 1958)
Authorities Cited
- White v. United States, 200 F.2d 509 (5th Cir. 1952)
- Wilson v. Illinois, 347 U.S. 928 (U.S. 1954)
- United States v. Taffs, 347 U.S. 928 (U.S. 1954)
- Horne v. United States, 246 F.2d 83 (5th Cir. 1957)
- Williams v. United States, 208 F.2d 447 (5th Cir. 1953)
- Normandale v. United States, 345 U.S. 999 (U.S. 1953)
- Robinson v. Georgia, 345 U.S. 999 (U.S. 1953)
- McDONOLD v. United States, 200 F.2d 502 (5th Cir. 1952)