WM. H. WISE COMPANY, INC., A CORPORATION, ET AL., PETITIONERS,

v.

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, RESPONDENT

D.C. Cir. | 1957-06-06

No. 13647

Before Edgerton, Chief Judge, and Wilbur K. Miller and Bastían, Circuit Judges.

246 F.2d 702 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1957) Positive Treatment

Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

[*703] PER CURIAM.

The Federal Trade Commission’s order directs the petitioners to cease and desist from “1. Using fictitiously any trade or corporate name in collecting past-due accounts ; 2. Implying that such fictitious collection agency is an independent organization engaged in the business of collecting past-due accounts.” We find no error. Affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

Sunshine ART Studios, Inc. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 481 F.2d 1171 (1st Cir. 1973)
United States v. Shepard Boneparth & J. S. Boneparth & Sons, Inc., 456 F.2d 497 (2d Cir. 1972)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw

WM. H. WISE COMPANY, INC., A CORPORATION, ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, RESPONDENT

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

WM. H. WISE COMPANY, INC., A CORPORATION, ET AL., PETITIONERS,

v.

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, RESPONDENT