CLARENCE B. DANDRIDGE, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE

D.C. Cir. | 1957-07-08
No. 13813
Before Edgerton, Chief Judge, and Prettyman and Burger, Circuit Judges., EDGERTON, Chief Judge, dissents.
247 F.2d 105 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1957) Caution
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant urges that the District Court abused its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw a plea of guilty to a charge of assault with a deadly weapon contemporaneous with dismissal of a charge of carrying a dangerous weapon.

A hearing was conducted in which the District Judge questioned appellant and his counsel on the circumstances surrounding the making of a plea of guilty before he denied the motion. We find no abuse of discretion.

Affirmed.

EDGERTON, Chief Judge, dissents.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw