CLINCHFIELD RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
J. RALPH ERWIN, APPELLEE

6th Cir. | 1957-11-12
No. 13082
249 F.2d 719 United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (1957) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

In this action brought by an employee of the appellant railroad company under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (U.S.C.A., Title 45, § 51 et seq.), judgment for $15,000 damages on the verdict of a jury was entered in the district court.

The appellant urges that the injuries received by the appellee were not in natural and probable consequence of the negligence of the carrier. Upon consideration of the entire record in the case, we are of opinion that, applying the pertinent decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States in F.E.L.A. cases, there was substantial evidence to sustain the verdict of the jury. See Webb v. Ill. Cent. R. R. Co., 352 U.S. 512, 1 L.Ed.2d 503; Lavender v. Kurn, 327 U.S. 645, 653, 66 S.Ct. 740, 90 L.Ed. 919; Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line Ry. Co., 318 U.S. 54, 63 S.Ct. 444, 87 L.Ed. 610.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw