PIERRE BOURGEOIS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
BANQUE PRANCAISE DU COMMERCE EXTERSEUR, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court considered whether a defendant convicted of violating a city ordinance prohibiting excessive noise from animals was denied a jury trial and whether the ordinance was unconstitutional.
The court found that the denial of a jury trial was not error, and that the ordinance was not unconstitutional on its face or as applied, upholding the conviction.
The defendant was convicted of violating an ordinance for keeping noisy dogs whose barking disturbed a neighbor. The defendant challenged the ordinanc…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the authority of Bank of America v. Whitney Central National Bank, 261 U.S. 171, 43 S.Ct. 311, 67 L.Ed. 594. And see International Shoe Co. v. State of Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 66 S.Ct. 154, 90 L.Ed. 95; McGee v. International Life Ins. Co., 78 S.Ct. 199.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Int'l Shoe Co. v. State OF Wash., 326 U.S. 310 (U.S. 1945)
- McGEE v. Int'l Life Ins. Co., 355 U.S. 220 (U.S. 1957)
- Bank of Am. v. Whitney Cent. Nat'l Bank, 261 U.S. 171 (U.S. 1923)