IRVING KLAW, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
ROBERT H. SCHAFFER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS POSTMASTER OF THE UNITED STATES POST OFFICE AT NEW YORK, N. Y., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
IRVING KLAW, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
ROBERT H. SCHAFFER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS POSTMASTER OF THE UNITED STATES POST OFFICE AT NEW YORK, N. Y., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
251 F.2d 615
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1958)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 16 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the opinion below, 151 F. Supp. 534. Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 77 S.Ct. 1304, 1 L.Ed.2d 1498; Public Clearing House v. Coyne, 194 U.S. 497, 24 S.Ct. 789, 48 L.Ed. 1092.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Klaw, 350 F.2d 155 (2d Cir. 1965)
-
Vibra Brush Corp. v. Schaffer, 256 F.2d 681 (2d Cir. 1958)
-
Bernd W. Sandt and Nancy T. Sandt v. Commissioner OF Internal Revenue, 303 F.2d 111 (3d Cir. 1962)
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (U.S. 1957)
- Public Clearing House v. Coyne, 194 U.S. 497 (U.S. 1904)