NELSON TUCKER, APPELLANT,
v.
WILBER M. BRUCKER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, ET AL., APPELLEES; WARREN BERNABEI, APPELLANT, V. ARTHUR E. SUMMERFIELD, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL., APPELLEES
NELSON TUCKER, APPELLANT,
WILBER M. BRUCKER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, ET AL., APPELLEES; WARREN BERNABEI, APPELLANT, V. ARTHUR E. SUMMERFIELD, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL., APPELLEES
251 F.2d 898
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1958)
Caution
Cited by 13 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We think the District Court erred in awarding summary judgments in these cases to the defendants, and dismissing the complaints, on the ground of laches. Duncan v. Summerfield, 102 U.S.App.D.C.-, 251 F. 2d 896.
Reversed and remanded.
BASTIAN, Circuit Judge, dissents, believing that the actions are barred by laches.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Application of Klaus Heinz Risse, 378 F.2d 948 (C.C.P.A. 1967)
-
Application of Richard G. Smith, 458 F.2d 1389 (C.C.P.A. 1972)
-
Cal. Research Corp. v. Ladd, 356 F.2d 813 (D.C. Cir. 1966)
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Duncan v. Summerfield, 251 F.2d 896 (D.C. Cir. 1957)