MORRIS MAC SCHWEBEL, APPELLANT,
v.
ANDREW D. ORRICK, HAROLD C. PATTERSON, EARL F. HASTINGS, JAMES C. SARGENT, APPELLEES
MORRIS MAC SCHWEBEL, APPELLANT,
ANDREW D. ORRICK, HAROLD C. PATTERSON, EARL F. HASTINGS, JAMES C. SARGENT, APPELLEES
251 F.2d 919
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1958)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant asked the District Court to enjoin the Securities and Exchange Commission from conducting a hearing to determine whether appellant should be prevented from continuing to practice before the Commission. Though we think the District Court was right in dismissing the complaint, we think the plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedy and the court therefore erred in ruling on the Commission’s authority to disbar attorneys. Camp v. Herzog, 88 U.S.App.D.C. 373, 190 F. 2d 605.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Touche Ross & Co. v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, 609 F.2d 570 (2d Cir. 1979)
-
Capitol Packing Co. v. United States, 350 F.2d 67 (10th Cir. 1965)
-
M. G. Davis & Co., Inc. v. Cohen, 369 F.2d 360 (2d Cir. 1966)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Camp v. Herzog, 190 F.2d 605 (D.C. Cir. 1951)