VIDONIO MERCADO, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
VIDONIO MERCADO, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
427 So. 2d 338
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1983)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Mullins v. State, 366 So. 2d 1162 (Fla.1978) (Alderman, J., concurring), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 883, 100 S.Ct. 173, 62 L.Ed.2d 113 (1979); Wright v. State, 418 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Neely v. State, 402 So. 2d 477 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Login v. State, 394 So. 2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); State v. Ramos, 378 So. 2d 1294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).
We have examined the issue presented by the cross-appeal and find the cross-appeal to be without merit.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Mullins v. State, 366 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. 1978)
- Login v. State, 394 So. 2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
- Worldwide Church of God, Inc. v. Superior Court of Cal., 444 U.S. 883 (U.S. 1979)
- Pate v. Kentucky, 444 U.S. 883 (U.S. 1979)
- Wright v. State, 418 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
- State v. Raunel Ramos, 378 So. 2d 1294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
- Neely v. State, 402 So. 2d 477 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981)