UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
v.
GARLAND ALFONZO HARDY, APPELLANT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
GARLAND ALFONZO HARDY, APPELLANT
252 F.2d 780
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1958)
Caution
Cited by 16 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the opinion of Judge Cashin, D.C., 159 F.Supp. 208. As to appellant’s claim of ineffective legal representation before sentence in that his counsel refused to appeal the denial of a motion to suppress evidence, we also point out that a direct appeal does not lie from the denial of such a motion made after indictment. Cogen v. United States, 278 U.S. 221, 49 S.Ct. 118, 73 L.Ed. 275; Carroll v. United States, 354 U.S. 394, 404, 77 S.Ct. 1332, 1 L.Ed.2d 1442.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wallach v. Rosenberg, 527 So. 2d 1386 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)
-
Gordon v. United States, 438 F.2d 858 (5th Cir. 1971)
-
Westchester Fire Ins. Co. v. Hanley, 284 F.2d 409 (6th Cir. 1960)
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Cogen v. United States, 278 U.S. 221 (U.S. 1929)
- Carroll v. United States, 354 U.S. 394 (U.S. 1957)