NATURAL GAS PIPELINE COMPANY OF AMERICA, APPELLANT,
v.
D. D. HARRINGTON ET AL., APPELLEES; D. D. HARRINGTON ET AL., APPELLANTS, V. NATURAL GAS PIPELINE COMPANY OF AMERICA, APPELLEE

5th Cir. | 1958-03-05
No. 16206
253 F.2d 231 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1958) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Leave to file a second petition for rehearing is denied. Natural Gas Co. of America v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44, 75 S.Ct. 576, 99 L.Ed. 683. The notation of Mr. Justice Douglas’ dissent shows that the Court considered the question presented by this second petition for rehearing. See also the recent per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court in Cities Service Gas Co. v. State Corporation Commission of Kansas, No. 85, 78 S.Ct. 381; and in Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma, No. 86, 78 S.Ct. 409; Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma, No. 111, 78 S.Ct. 409; Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma, No. 112, 78 S.Ct. 409; Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma, No. 113, 78 S.Ct. 410.

Leave to file

Denied.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw